In
“Gamer”, the film follows a corrupt individual changing and revolutionizing the
way society looks at video gaming. Castle, an extremely wealthy madman enjoys
his riches while bringing down society and individuals making them into his
mindless puppets. To explore “Gamer’s” society, we have to first take into
consideration society’s involvement in their virtual worlds. Individuals are
immersed in their second lives as society changes drastically into somewhat of
a dystopia. Humanz is an organization created to stop these changes, and their
legacy lives on with the help of the main character Kable. Death row inmates in the film have an option
of literally living in a virtual world and being controlled by people around
the planet in a gruesome death match called Slayers. This is a worldwide
phenomenon and is considered to be morally correct with the people of Earth.
Kable is a part of this game as he is forced and tricked by Castle into
becoming a prisoner that is watched by millions. Society and the prison system
are obviously corrupt in this world. Although these seem to be gruesome and
disturbing points, the issue of having death row inmates participate in these
games is disputable regarding its matters on morality.
Prisoners
who are death row inmates are the worst of the worst. They are on the line for
Capital Punishment, or in other words the Death Penalty for acts which include
murder, rape, and other forbidding adultery. I would like to look more into
this disputable question as I feel as if “Gamer”, acts as a commentary and
tries to warn its viewers. The film tries to caution its viewers of not just
how we treat our prisoners today, but what will become of society if we do not
take a different approach to how we go about using our technology in such ways
where it is not abused. It also shows the viewers on what could happen if
people take the word of manipulative individuals and use their teachings as the
way of the world. I am in favor in regards to Capital Punishment because of the
fact that there are just some sociopathic and mentally corrupted individuals
that should not walk amongst the Earth with other human beings. Having said
this, I would like to add another point regarding death row inmates being a
part of “Slayer”. It is true that inmates on death row have nothing to live for
in terms of the heinous crimes they have committed, but having them controlled
like puppets by society is not only disgusting but it shows that society
quickly gives in to inclinations made by certain “powerful” figures. Society is
disregarding the fact if it is appropriate or fitting for human beings to
experience and be a part of such brutality.
Humans
have a difficulty thinking independently. I say this with no sources but with
knowledge of historical events. If one takes WWII into consideration, and
thinks about the motives of Adolf Hitler, what made Germany justify his
actions? It is true that individuals living in Nazi Germany did not have a say
regarding whom they could elect for office, but it is absurd on all levels when
people get attached to these inclinations and start believing the word of these
so called “powerful” figures. This film warns its viewers not too get caught up
in such irrationality and to think logically. While thinking logically, one
cannot justify the actions of Castle in this film. When one disagrees with why
prisoners should not be given the option to be controlled in this game, or to
play this game in general, they should take obvious factors of corruption in
society into consideration. When individuals are exposed to such violence in
their lives, it is accepted as normality in their minds to perceive violence in
everyday life. There is a reason why movies and video games have a rating
system, but considering the extreme brutal aspect, even “Slayer” won’t be fit
with a rating system. If this game was to be accepted in our society,
corruption would flood the United States of America. Most violent crimes would
be accepted into our everyday lives and society would have an extreme reaction
to this game. It disgusts me to say that people would indeed play this game if it
was accepted in our society. This is why technology should not be abused early
on in our lifetimes, to avoid these “controversial” decisions on if it is
morally lawful to have a game like “Slayer” accepted into our society.
Watching death occur in a live telecast or a
television is wrong at all costs. This would be a devastating act and murder
would be more common in our society. Horror would overcome this world and the
beauty and innocence would perish. We as humans need to be vigilant and wise in
our choices and take precautions to all new technological developments. This is
basically the same as thinking before an individual speaks accept that the
world advances quickly, so we need to think twice as much before we act. This
world has enough issues, and violence should definitely not become the leading
factor of the problems that surround our society. In my eyes, this film taps
into a fear of social decline, and individuals dehumanizing each other. While
this film serves as great entertainment, the thought of this unfolding into a
reality is haunting. This film is indeed a social commentary and we should make
aware of its signs. “Gamer” does an excellent job of painting these haunting
images in your mind. The viewers are put in a sense of fear and apprehension
after watching this film, and some individuals like me, try to justify the
actions of the characters in this film by overthinking the scenarios in my
mind. Therefore, I enjoy writing about this topic just because of the fact that
I would like to urge individuals to think logically and not too get caught up
in the trends and inclinations of society. If something like this ever occurs
in our world, we should have the decency and power to be able to put an end to
it. Unity is a powerful force that should not be ignored especially during
difficult times. Gamer as a piece of fiction does include elements of satire. For
example, naming the main character Kable while he is watched by millions as he
plays through “Slayer” pokes fun at society as this is one of the few signs
Gamer utilizes to send a message to its audience.
Conclusively,
this film shows its audience what could happen to our society if we indulge ourselves
into a corrupt technological world with no morals. It’s an excellent wake up
call for not only heavy gamers but society itself. I would recommend it to
viewers of all ages to watch this film and pay close attention to what type of
message “Gamer” is trying to convey.
Shaunt,
ReplyDeleteThis is an excellent essay. I really like that you focused on one aspect of Gamer, one that is controversial to our society: death row inmates. These so-called "forgotten souls" (my words, my take) seem to be pitted as the worst of the worst, with no chance to redeem themselves in this life. The filmmakers of Gamer know this, which is why they were the subject of violent entertainment and control from the wealthy. I wonder if we can make any comparisons to Gamer's society and our own, in terms of the treatment of death row prisoners? It's a difficult subject, and one you may research for the portfolio, but your analysis is vey good. I, too, would be haunted by such a society if it were ever to come into fruition.
One thing I was curious about...you wrote in your first paragraph that "[t]his is a worldwide phenomenon and is considered to be morally correct with the people of Earth." Do you believe that Gamer's fictional setting was American or worldwide? It seems Gamer was made for an American audience, but is it strictly for Americans or for other societies of the world?